MILITARY MANAGEMENT QUARTERLY

MILITARY MANAGEMENT QUARTERLY

Identifying and Prioritizing the Improving Strategies of Educational and Training Processes in Imam Ali Military University (With Focus on Scientific-Research Interactions)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 University of Imam Ali
2 Imam Ali University
10.22034/IAMU.2022.545994.2685
Abstract
This study aims to improve educational and training processes in Imam Ali Military University (IAMU), focusing on synergy, scientific-research interactions, and formulation and prioritization of effective strategies. In this applied- action research, 30 people were selected from among 150 experts, professors and commanders of IAMU according to the theoretical saturation of experts. Data collected through the semi-structured questionnaire, and analyzed and prioritized by SWOT and QSPM methods. Research results showed that the strategic position of the university is in the offensive area. After identifying the strategies and prioritizing them; through interviews with experts, practical strategies to reach the desired point were formulated and prioritized in five thematic groups: knowledge enhancement, interaction and cooperation with scientific societies, revision of internal laws, updating of equipment and resources, and creation of an educational and research work group. The results showed that the strategy of "holding short-term knowledge-enhancing courses in new sciences and knowledge" with an attractiveness score of 7.8511 has the first priority.
Keywords

Ardil, C. (2021). A Comparative Analysis of Multiple Criteria Decision Making Analysis Methods for Strategic, Tactical, and Operational Decisions in Military Fighter Aircraft Selection. Int. J. of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, 14(7), 275-288.
Fox, W. P., Spence, G., Kitchen, R., & Powell, S. (2020). Using the entropy weighting scheme in military decision making. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, 17(4), 409-418.
Greer, J., Colonel, U.S. Army (2018). Training: The foundation for success in combat. Avillable at: https://www.heritage.org/military-strength-topical-essays/2019-essays/training-the-foundation-success-combat.
Mowshowitz, A., & Dehmer, M. (2012). Entropy and the complexity of graphs revisited. Entropy, 14(3), 559-570.
Navas, R. E., Cuppens, F., Cuppens, N. B., Toutain, L., & Papadopoulos, G. Z. (2020). Mtd, where art thou? a systematic review of moving target defense techniques for iot. IEEE internet of things journal.
Raza, A., & Ulansky, V. (2019). Optimization of Condition Monitoring Decision Making by the Criterion of Minimum Entropy. Entropy, 21(12), 1193.
Rodrigues, F. C. (1989). A proposed entropy measure for assessing combat degradation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 40(8), 789-793.
Straathof, Sebastiaan, 2012, A note on Shannon’s entropy as an index of product variety, No 31, Research Memorandum from Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT), 2012
Steele, R. (2019). Army Reserve Officer Training Summer Camp: Examining the Relationship between Leader Development Activities and Leadership Evaluations.
Touš, M., Máša, V., & Vondra, M. (2021). Energy and water savings in military base camps. Energy Systems, 12(2), 545-562.
Ujjan, R. M. A., Pervez, Z., Dahal, K., Khan, W. A., & Hayat, B. (2021). Entropy Based Features Distribution for Anti-DDoS Model in SDN. Sustainability, 13(3), 15-22.
Warren, L. (2015). A new interpretation of the Shannon entropy measure. DEFENCE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY GROUP EDINBURGH (AUSTRALIA).
Zhou, Y., Tang, Y., & Zhao, X. (2019). A novel uncertainty management approach for air combat situation assessment based on improved belief entropy. Entropy, 21(5), 495.
Zhou, W., Chen, J., & Ding, B. (2018). Optimal flow distribution of military supply transportation based on network analysis and entropy. Entropy, 20(6), 446.