Examination of organizational factors influencing the optimization of training in the operational units of the army of the Islamic Republic of Iran (subject of the study of hovaniroz Aja)

Behdadfar, Mohammad Rasoul; Babaei, Hamza; Alimohamadi, Sajad

doi:10.22034/iamu.2026.2081085.3243

Examination of organizational factors influencing the optimization of training in the operational units of the army of the Islamic Republic of Iran (subject of the study of hovaniroz Aja)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

mohammad rasoul Behdadfar ¹

Hamza Babaei ²

sajad alimohamadi ²

¹ Assistant Professor, Command and Staff College, AJA Command and Staff University, Tehran, Iran.

² Instructor, Command and Staff College, AJA Command and Staff University, Tehran, Iran.

10.22034/iamu.2026.2081085.3243

Abstract

Training units in the units operational army of the Islamic Republic of Iran as one of the main pillars of the promotion be, the Martial and defence the country, playing a vital role in the increase in specialized knowledge, enhanced skills, operational and coordination among the orders roles. The present study aimed to identify the organizational factors affecting the optimization of training units in the U.S. had no more Aja is done.
The research method was designed in a practical and mixed approach (qualitative and quantitative). In the qualitative section, the data was collected through the review of documents and semi-structured interviews with 8 silver educational experts and examined by the method of thematic analysis. In the quantitative sector, the statistical community consisted of 80 managers, assistants and educational experts of the air bases of the day, with the use of the Cochran formula, the sample size of 66 people was determined and the data was collected with a questionnaire of 65 questions in three areas of learners, recruits and educational content. The instrument's footprint was confirmed by kronbach's alpha of 0.963, and the data were analyzed by Z statistical tests and Friedman rankings.
The findings showed that unified education is most effective when the three main axes of learners, learners and educational texts are promoted simultaneously and harmoniously. In the learners ' dimension, confidence, learning motivation and positive attitude played the most part.

Keywords

unit training

defense management

organizational factors

optimization of education

inclusive and inclusive

Subjects

MILITARY MANAGEMENT

· بابائی,حمزه , جمالی,احمدمهدی , شیخ,علیرضا و اصغرزاده,اصغر . (1403). بهینه‌سازی نقش فراده در ارتقای آموزش‌های یکانی ارتش جمهوری اسلامی ایران. فصلنامه مطالعات جنگ, 6(22), 45-68. doi: 10.22034/qjws.2024.2032636.1220

· توحیدی, ارسطو و دوست محمدی, محمدرضا . (1402). راهبردهای آموزش حین خدمت در ارتش جمهوری اسلامی ایران. مطالعات دفاعی استراتژیک, 21(92), 49-68. article_2419_36d672703e0fc9aa86e4975d684f077f.pdf

· جلیلیان، حمیدرضا؛ مرادی، مرتضی و باتمانی، محمد امین. (1404). عارضه‌یابی و شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر کیفیت دوره‌های آموزش ضمن خدمت بر اساس تکنیک دلفی فازی. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی، 17(1)، 33–52. https://doi.org/10.22080/shrm.2025.5840.

· حسینی ضرابی، حامد؛ خراسانی، اباصلت؛ رضایی زاده، مرتضی و مظاهری تهرانی، محمد علی. (1400). بررسی روش‌های ایجاد تعامل و بهبود مشارکت دانشجویان در فرایند یادگیری در آموزش عالی: یک مرور نظام‌مند. رویکردهای نوین آموزشی، 16(1)، 77-96. doi: 10.22108/nea.2022.130450.1677

· رشتیانی، سهراب؛ خورسندی طاسکوه، علی؛ طاهری، مرتضی و عباس پور، عباس. (1403). توسعۀ رهبری مدیران گروه‌های آموزشی دانشگاه‌ها: مطالعۀ فراترکیب، ارزیابی و رشد سرمایه‌های انسانی، تابستان 1(1)، 63-86.

· قاسمیان دستجردی، زهرا؛ عزتی، میترا؛ افروز، غلامعلی؛ پورکریمی، جواد و برادران حقیر، مریم. (1404). شناسایی عوامل و مولفه های آموزش فراگیر: مطالعه ای فراترکیب، دوفصلنامه پژوهش های آموزش و یادگیری، 22(1)، 145-166. magiran.com/p2912380,. https://doi.org/10.22054/hrd.2025.15842

· علیمرادی، زینب. (1400). بررسی و تحلیل نقش اشتیاق و انگیزش تحصیلی در پیشرفت دانش آموزان، نشریه رهیافت های نوین در مطالعات اسلامی، 3(6)، 183. magiran.com/p2289573

· فتحی واجارگاه، کوروش. (1394). برنامه‌ریزی آموزش ضمن خدمت کارکنان، انتشارات سمت، چاپ دهم.

· فتحی‌آذر، اسکندر؛ ادیب، یوسف و گل‌پرور، فرشته. (1395). پدیدارشناسی عوامل مؤثر و برانگیزاننده در کیفیت دوره‌های آموزش ضمن خدمت معلمان. فصلنامه علمی پژوهش در یادگیری آموزشگاهی و مجازی، 3(12)، 47-56.

· قاسمی، حسن. (1398). چگونگی ارتقای کیفیت آموزش دانشجویان دوره عالی مرا مخ، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دافوس آجا.

· کینلا، دنیس. (1397). توانمندسازی منابع انسانی، ترجمه دکتر مهدی ایران‌نژاد پاریزی، معصوم سلیمیان- نشر مدیران، چاپ چهارم.

· مارک ج. سینجر. ترجمه آل آقا، فریده. (1378). مدیریت نیروی انسانی، انتشارات مرکز آموزش مدیریت دولتی، چاپ اول.

· قبادیان، مسلم؛ بگیان بگیان کوله مرزی، محمدجواد؛ فولادوند، شاپور؛ رحیمی، روح الله و حقانی، مریم. (1401). شناسایی عوامل موثر بر موفقیت برنامه های آموزش فراگیر، نشریه کودکان استثنایی، 22(3)، 57-76.

· مصطفوی، ولی ا....(1392). راهنمای استاد، انتشارات معاونت تربیت و آموزش نزاجا، چاپ اول.

· Ackah-Jnr, F. R. (2020). The teacher should be learning: In-service professional development and learning of teachers implementing inclusive education in early childhood education settings. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 16(2), 93-121. EJ1289803.pdf

· Alfaidi, S. D. A., & Elhassan, F. A. M. (2020). The role of in-service training programs in teachers’ development. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 12(3), 146–153. ijlt.org/uploadfile/2020/0903/20200903031648646.pdf

· Baird, K., Tung, A., & Su, S. (2020). Employee empowerment, performance appraisal quality and performance. Journal of Management Control, 31(4), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-020-00307-y

· Bhardwaj, V., Zhang, S., Tan, Y. Q., & Pandey, V. (2025). Redefining learning: Student-centered strategies for academic and personal growth. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1518602. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1518602

· Calton, J., Freeman, J., Cronin, P., Thompson, J., Warner, R., et al. (2021). Development and validation of the U.S. Army organizational learning maturity model. Technical Report, U.S. Army Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.21236/AD1122334 apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD1146687.pdf

· Dick, B. (2006). Action research literature 2004-2006: Themes and trends. Action Research, 4(4), 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750306070105

· González García, E., Colomo Magaña, E., & Cívico Ariza, A. (2020). Quality education as a sustainable development goal in the context of 2030 agenda: Bibliometric approach. Sustainability, 12(15), Article 5884. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155884

· Hattie, J., & O’Leary, T. (2025). Learning styles, preferences, or strategies? An explanation for the resurgence of styles across meta-analyses. Educational Psychology Review, 37(31). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10002-w

· Jocelyne, S., & Kariuki, M. (2020). Human capital, employee empowerment and organization performance. International Academic Journal of Human Resource and Business Administration, 3(9), 319–332. Retrieved from http://iajournals.org/articles/iajhrba_v3_i9_319_332.pdf

· Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2020). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (9th ed.). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429299612

· Martinez, M. E., & Gomez, V. (2025). Active learning strategies: A mini review of evidence-based approaches. Advances in Pedagogical and Educational Research, 4(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v4i1.555

· Murray, W. C., & Holmes, M. R. (2021). Impacts of Employee Empowerment and Organizational Commitment on Workforce Sustainability. Sustainability, 13(6), 3163. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063163

· Rashid, M. H. A. (2025). Understanding the three domains of learning: Cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. Teaching & Learning Journal. Retrieved from https://limbd.org/understanding-the-three-domains-of-learning-cognitive-affective-and-psychomotor/

· Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

· Sami, J. C. A., & Arumugam, U. (2020). A descriptive analysis of students’ learning skills using Bloom’s revised taxonomy. Journal of Computer Science, 16(8), 1120–1130. Retrieved from Semantic Scholar. DOI: 10.3844/jcssp.2020.183.193

· Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2022). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and practice (5th ed.). New York: Routledge.

· U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC). (2024). The Army learning concept for 2030–2040 (TP 525–8–2). Fort Eustis, VA: TRADOC. Retrieved from https://armypubs.army.mil, TRADOC Pamphlet 525-8-2

· Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024, October 28). Evaluate training: Measuring effectiveness. https://www.cdc.gov/training-development/php/about/evaluate-training-measuring-effectiveness.html

http://www.korbedpsych.com/LinkedFiles/102_04_PrinciplesFactorsLearning.pdf

· Padhi, G. (2021). Factors affecting teaching–learning process. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT), 9(4), 1843–1848. https://ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2104308.pdf

· Utah Leading through Effective, Actionable, and Dynamic Education (ULEAD). (2024). Factors influencing student learning [PDF]. https://schools.utah.gov/ulead/uleadfiles/reports/topicoverview/Factors%20Influencing%20Student%20Learning.pdf

· Hattie, J., & O’Leary, T. (2025). Learning styles, preferences, or strategies? An explanation for the resurgence of styles across many meta-analyses. Educational Psychology Review, 37, 31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10002-w

· Bremner, N. (2022). The outcomes of learner-centred pedagogy: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Development, 94, 102649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102649

· Temelli, Dinçer & Kartal, Osman & Şahin, Çavuş & Yazgan, Akan. (2021). Investigation of Teacher Roles in Educational Practices in The Covid-19 Pandemic: A Phenomenological Study. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi. 11. 309-332. 10.31704/ijocis.2021.015.

· Zohrabi, M. (2024). The use of assessment for learning rather than assessment of learning in EFL context. Applied Research on English Language, 13(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2024.140274.2210